agruener > Unfortunately it is much slower than the older version. (Palm)
elch33> it works as quickly as ever (PPC)
When I first generated the English text-only Wikipedia I had the same problem on my PPC. I don't know what causes TR3 to slow down, and with very long compile times (a week per revision) could not do much experimenting. So I tried removing all aliasses (redirects), which are half of the entries, to see if index size had something to do with it. That cured the problem on my PPC.
For the German Wikipedia I left all redirects in, because it has fewer entries than the English wp.
Even with delays I suppose the redirects are quite valuable and it would be a pity to leave them out. For a real explanation of what causes this problem and possibly a TR3 cure you have to ask Yadabyte. (but don't expect a solution anytime soon)
--------------------
Orbiter > But what is the difference between the PPC and the Palm version?
TomeRaider for Palm is quite inferior to TomeRaider for PPC. The PPC version uses the Explorer engine, so has full support for html, css, unicode.
For instance table syntax on TR3 Palm is sorely missed. The differences have become smaller now that I use png images for math, instead of own html rendered math, which needed html table syntax. The Palm file tries to make the best of limitations, but frankly I'm not sure it is worth the trouble, as most non- supported html and css will simply be ignored on Palm version.
Itsme and others: You can run both versions on both platforms and compare to judge for yourself. Itsme can you give some specific titles where tables are skipped?
-----------------
Elch33: : I noticed that you have exported the Database as of July 19, 2007. A
This date is taken from the file timestamp and reflects the date that I downloaded and unpacked the dump.
I should remember to update the file date to match the date shown on the download page,
e.g. http://download.wikimedia.org/dewiki/20070701/
I'm not sure from the top of my hat, why my newest scripts generate less articles, when same input was used, and whether that is an improvement or not, but the difference is 0.1%.
------------------
Orbiter > Vielleicht habe ich auch die Palm-Version bisher auf meinem PocketPC gehabt und deshalb sahen die Tabellen so mies aus.
The files published elsewhere use a much older version of my script. I spent from X-mas 2006 till a month ago to update the scripts for ever expanding Mediawiki syntax. The main reason that most tables looked so lousy with older script is they contain lots of conditional templates these days, which did not exist in this form a year ago.